Unreasonable

Forget the Elevator Pitch, Focus on the Tweet Pitch

Photo from Creative Commons

Entrepreneurs fret over the 30-second “elevator pitch.” In my twenty years starting startups, I did pitch twice in an actual elevator. However, now in 2016, entrepreneurs should be fretting more over their 140-character, one-line “tweet pitch.”

Why is this so important? Simple. Your startup is going to be listed on a dozen sites online, and all of them will include that one-line pitch: LinkedIn, AngelList, CrunchBase, Gust, Enable Impact, industry databases, crowdfunding sites, accelerators, competitions, etc.

Now, entrepreneurs should be fretting over their 140-character, one-line tweet pitch. Tweet This Quote

The tweet pitch gives you just three seconds to make a first impression, to entice the audience to bother to read the next paragraph, or to click to see the details. Not enough of the one-liners are clear, succinct and to the point.

My job includes perusing through tens of thousands of these profiles, seeking out potential “fledglings” for my accelerator. Other investors may not see thousands, but they will see hundreds of these one-liners each year.

To demonstrate, let’s start with one my own fledglings. They applied to Fledge with, “FRC is on a mission to preserve the Future of Clothing.” Luckily for them, I already knew what they really did, which is “Recycling cotton garment waste to create renewable fiber.” Personally, I’m still pushing for simpler, and more specific to one of their technologies: “Evrnu makes cotton recyclable.”

The tweet pitch gives you three seconds to make a first impression and entice the audience. Tweet This Quote

One of my Kick companies was, “TBGC a foodie-lifestyle company,” a one-liner that describes every organic food business. The company now says, “TBGC makes hummus, but from black eyed peas.” See the clarity? Tell us what you do, and in this case, what makes it unique.

An applicant that didn’t get invited said, “We are a startup that puts technology at the service of the environment.” This doesn’t tell us what problem is being solved or what the solution might be. The only useful words are “technology” and “environment.” This company’s website now says, “We combine technology with environment,” which is just as vague, but at least eliminates most of the superfluous words.

Further into their website is a much better, clearer tweet-sized explanation: “Web and mobile application for recycling”—an improvement, but still not specific enough. Their product description includes the one-liner they should have started with: “With [insert product], find the options to recycle or dispose your waste.”

Your tweet pitch should explain what problem is being solved or what the solution might be. Tweet This Quote

In another example, “[Insert company] harnesses the power of photosynthesis” piques my interest and makes me want to know more, but then I’m greatly disappointed to discover this company is really “An online magazine focused on natural medicines.” Or, they could say, “Explaining the power of natural medicines” to bring back a bit of the mystique, but with “explain” providing some hint that it’s a company producing content and “natural medicines” being more to the point than “photosynthesis.”

Do you need your company name in the pitch? That depends on the context. Ideally, take a look at some other profiles to see the layout before you fill out your own profile.

A few more examples of good tweet pitches:

And a few that are too vague:

If the reader can’t immediately understand what problem is being solved, the description may not be enough: “Producer and supplier of premium berry seed powder and oils” is nice and clear, but I’ve no idea who needs berry seed powder and oil.

Good tweet pitches tend to be shorter than the vague tweet pitches. Less truly is more. Tweet This Quote

Notice how the good tweets tend to be shorter than the vague tweets. Less truly is more. Let’s take out and shuffle the words to try and fix the vague tweets:

These are still a bit wordy and long, but greatly improved. If these companies were in my accelerator, I’d push them to continue refining them until they border on poetic.


A version of this post originally appeared on Luni’s blog.